"/>
<blockquote id="pl83f"><p id="pl83f"></p></blockquote>
<s id="pl83f"><li id="pl83f"></li></s>

      
      
      <sub id="pl83f"><rt id="pl83f"></rt></sub>

        <blockquote id="pl83f"><p id="pl83f"></p></blockquote>
        <sub id="pl83f"><rt id="pl83f"></rt></sub>
        女人的天堂av在线播放,3d动漫精品一区二区三区,伦精品一区二区三区视频,国产成人av在线影院无毒,亚洲成av人片天堂网老年人,最新国产精品剧情在线ss,视频一区无码中出在线,无码国产精品久久一区免费

        Obsession with protectionism will make U.S. lose trade wars: U.S. expert

        Source: Xinhua    2018-02-07 20:53:43

        BEIJING, Feb.7 (Xinhua) -- The Trump administration's obsession with protectionism and its trade measures against countries like China miss the root cause of U.S. trade deficits, and will probably make the United States a loser in trade wars, a U.S. economist warned in a recent article.

        In his Project Syndicate article "How to Lose a Trade War" published on Jan. 26, Stephen S. Roach, a senior fellow at Yale University, said the protectionist approach taken by the United States "could very well spark retaliatory measures that will only exacerbate the plight of beleaguered middle-class American consumers."

        "This is exactly how trade wars begin," he said.

        Roach pointed out that China is a clear target. On Jan. 23, Washington announced a series of tariffs on the import of solar panels and washing machines under the outdated Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974. The move primarily targets China and South Korea. "Significantly, the move could be the opening of salvo in a series of measures," he said.

        However, the moves could lead to the U.S. losing trade wars, the economist cautioned, listing three reasons.

        First, tariffs on solar panels and washing machines are "hopelessly out of step with transformative shifts in the global supply chains of both industries," Roach said.

        Second, Roach said Trump's protectionist policies pose a grave threat to "America's already daunting external funding requirements -- putting the pressure on U.S. interest rates, the dollar's exchange rate, or both."

        The Trump administration's focus on the trade imbalance with China has made it "miss the far broader macroeconomic forces that have spawned a U.S. multilateral trade deficit with 101 countries," Roach said.

        On top of that, it is expected that America's trade partners will retaliate with countermeasures, which would put "export-led U.S. economic growth at serious risk."

        He gave two examples. Since China is the third largest and fastest-growing U.S. export market, retaliatory tariffs by Beijing could harm America's major exports to China, including soybeans, aircraft, machinery and motor vehicle components. China could also cut down its purchase of U.S. treasuries, which would seriously affect their price.

        U.S. consumers are already feeling the impact. South Korea's LG Electronics, a leading foreign supplier of washing machines, has announced a 50-dollar price increase per unit in response to the tariffs.

        Trade wars are always for losers. Perhaps that is the greatest irony for a president who promised America would be the "ultimate winner."

        Similar empty promises were made in 1930 by Senator Reed Smoot and Representative Willis Hawley. They led to protectionist tariffs that exacerbated the Great Depression and destabilized the international order.

        Sadly, one of the most painful lessons of modern history has been all but forgotten.

        Editor: pengying
        Related News
        Xinhuanet

        Obsession with protectionism will make U.S. lose trade wars: U.S. expert

        Source: Xinhua 2018-02-07 20:53:43

        BEIJING, Feb.7 (Xinhua) -- The Trump administration's obsession with protectionism and its trade measures against countries like China miss the root cause of U.S. trade deficits, and will probably make the United States a loser in trade wars, a U.S. economist warned in a recent article.

        In his Project Syndicate article "How to Lose a Trade War" published on Jan. 26, Stephen S. Roach, a senior fellow at Yale University, said the protectionist approach taken by the United States "could very well spark retaliatory measures that will only exacerbate the plight of beleaguered middle-class American consumers."

        "This is exactly how trade wars begin," he said.

        Roach pointed out that China is a clear target. On Jan. 23, Washington announced a series of tariffs on the import of solar panels and washing machines under the outdated Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974. The move primarily targets China and South Korea. "Significantly, the move could be the opening of salvo in a series of measures," he said.

        However, the moves could lead to the U.S. losing trade wars, the economist cautioned, listing three reasons.

        First, tariffs on solar panels and washing machines are "hopelessly out of step with transformative shifts in the global supply chains of both industries," Roach said.

        Second, Roach said Trump's protectionist policies pose a grave threat to "America's already daunting external funding requirements -- putting the pressure on U.S. interest rates, the dollar's exchange rate, or both."

        The Trump administration's focus on the trade imbalance with China has made it "miss the far broader macroeconomic forces that have spawned a U.S. multilateral trade deficit with 101 countries," Roach said.

        On top of that, it is expected that America's trade partners will retaliate with countermeasures, which would put "export-led U.S. economic growth at serious risk."

        He gave two examples. Since China is the third largest and fastest-growing U.S. export market, retaliatory tariffs by Beijing could harm America's major exports to China, including soybeans, aircraft, machinery and motor vehicle components. China could also cut down its purchase of U.S. treasuries, which would seriously affect their price.

        U.S. consumers are already feeling the impact. South Korea's LG Electronics, a leading foreign supplier of washing machines, has announced a 50-dollar price increase per unit in response to the tariffs.

        Trade wars are always for losers. Perhaps that is the greatest irony for a president who promised America would be the "ultimate winner."

        Similar empty promises were made in 1930 by Senator Reed Smoot and Representative Willis Hawley. They led to protectionist tariffs that exacerbated the Great Depression and destabilized the international order.

        Sadly, one of the most painful lessons of modern history has been all but forgotten.

        [Editor: huaxia]
        010020070750000000000000011100001369568481
        主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩一区日韩二区日韩三区 | 日韩av日韩av在线| 国产精品va在线观看无码不卡| 免费国产小视频在线观看| 九九热精品免费视频| 亚洲老熟女一区二区三区| 99视频30精品视频在线观看| 久久久久无码精品国产h动漫| 久久青草精品38国产免费| 国产精品自拍三级在线观看 | 亚洲av午夜福利精品一区二区 | 亚洲av中文一区二区| 国产人免费人成免费视频| 人人爽人人爽人人片a免费| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久| 亚洲美女视频一区| 亚洲香蕉网久久综合影视| 国产v亚洲v天堂a无码99| 亚洲一区二区偷拍精品| 蜜臀精品无码av在线播放| 亚欧洲乱码视频一二三区| 成人无码www免费视频| 国产成人综合久久亚洲精品| 水蜜桃视频在线观看免费18| 亚洲v欧美v日韩v国产v| 少妇人妻88久久中文字幕| 久久亚洲欧美日本精品| 粉嫩jk制服美女啪啪| 亚洲国产成人久久一区久久 | 91精品国产福利尤物免费| 国产一区二区三区免费观看| 亚洲免费成人av一区| 成人午夜电影福利免费| 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区不卡 | 色悠久久网国产精品99| 亚洲色最新高清AV网站| 欧美高清freexxxx性| 久久青青草原精品国产app| 日韩在线视频一区二区三| 国产精品久久久久孕妇| 在线精品自拍亚洲第一区|