<blockquote id="pl83f"><p id="pl83f"></p></blockquote>
<s id="pl83f"><li id="pl83f"></li></s>

      
      
      <sub id="pl83f"><rt id="pl83f"></rt></sub>

        <blockquote id="pl83f"><p id="pl83f"></p></blockquote>
        <sub id="pl83f"><rt id="pl83f"></rt></sub>
        女人的天堂av在线播放,3d动漫精品一区二区三区,伦精品一区二区三区视频,国产成人av在线影院无毒,亚洲成av人片天堂网老年人,最新国产精品剧情在线ss,视频一区无码中出在线,无码国产精品久久一区免费

        Commentary: Why the U.S. tariff threat is futile

        Source: Xinhua| 2018-08-09 15:24:02|Editor: xuxin
        Video PlayerClose

        by Xinhua writer Liu Jie

        BEIJING, Aug. 9 (Xinhua) -- Trade conflicts are nothing new in U.S. economic history, and they invariably go through the same tired cycle. Initially the United States intended to limit competition and bulwark its economy, but quickly ended up damaging the wider economy.

        The Great Depression of the 1930s is a perfect case in point. Under economic pressure, President Herbert Hoover signed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act into law, increasing tariffs on more than 20,000 imported goods, which soon drew retaliatory duties from several outraged U.S. trading partners. Consequently, the U.S. imports and exports slumped by more than 60 percent, exacerbating the depression and damaging the global economy.

        In the past three decades, U.S. trade conflicts focused on several areas, including bananas, wood, steel and tyres. But higher tariffs on those goods never fixed the U.S. economy, and instead made all parties worse off.

        What's past is prologue.

        The United States has launched the largest trade war in economic history. To "make America great again," it hopes to eliminate the trade deficit with China as it deems it detrimental to the U.S. economy.

        However, China and the United States give very different numbers on what the trade deficit actually is. According to U.S. Census Bureau data, the trade deficit with China ran to a record 375 billion U.S. dollars in 2017, while China's customs calculates the country's surplus with the United States at 275 billion dollars.

        "Statistical discrepancies have inflated the U.S. calculation of its trade deficit with China by about 20 percent every year," according to Zhong Shan, China's minister of commerce.

        An iPhone, for example, plays a significant role in skewing the apparent U.S. trade deficit with China. On the surface, the deficit appears to be 375 billion dollars, with the iPhone series alone accounting for around 4.4 percent of that, but the true figure is far lower.

        Because iPhones are assembled in China, the headline numbers count almost the entire manufacturing cost of an iPhone, while in reality very little of that money is spent in China.

        According to IHS Markit, an iPhone's components cost a total of 370.25 dollars. Of that, 110 dollars goes to Samsung Electronics in the Republic of Korea (ROK) for supplying displays. Another 44.45 dollars goes to Japan's Toshiba Corp and the ROK's SK Hynix for memory chips.

        Other suppliers from the United States and Europe also take their portion, while assembly, by contract manufacturers in China like Foxconn, represents only an estimated 3 to 6 percent of the manufacturing cost.

        In this typical case, is it fair to claim that China seizes all the trade surplus in its iPhone exports to the United States?

        The United States has a problem, but it is not with China, it is at home, according to Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning American economist. "America has been saving too little," he wrote in his recent article, indicating that U.S. policymakers should do what they could to increase national savings for reducing the multilateral trade deficit if they had a whit of understanding of economics and a long-term vision.

        He said that significantly reducing the bilateral trade deficit in a meaningful way would prove difficult, and that China's overall trade balance, like that of the United States, was determined by macroeconomics.

        The U.S. imposition of tariffs on 50 billion U.S. dollars of imports from China has already backfired.

        The U.S. overall trade deficit increased 7.3 percent in June, according to the U.S. Commerce Department. It is on track to hit a 10-year high.

        Spanning nearly 40 years of diplomatic relations, trade conflicts are nothing new between China and the United States. History has shown the two countries have never run short of meaningful ways to navigate choppy waters.

        One conflict dates back to the 1980s when the two economies became fractious over textiles. After the two sides settled an agreement through negotiation and Chinese businessmen even opened textile mills in the United States, the textile industry actually became a terrain that had created more manufacturing jobs in the United States and generated more cooperation than confrontation.

        History and statistics have shown that waging a trade war is futile in the end. All the United States needs is to make a wise option.

        KEY WORDS: Trade
        EXPLORE XINHUANET
        010020070750000000000000011100001373787641
        主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人精品白浆免费视频试看 | 日本久久久久亚洲中字幕| 欧美一区二区三区啪啪| 国产偷国产偷亚洲高清人| 亚洲an日韩专区在线| 在线观看成人永久免费网站| 强伦人妻一区二区三区视频18| 成人特黄特色毛片免费看| 国产成人综合欧美精品久久| 波多野吉av无码av乱码在线| 一区二区在线观看成人午夜| 亚洲精品无码人妻无码| 国产精品成熟老妇女| 精品中文字幕人妻一二| 中文有无人妻VS无码人妻激烈 | 少妇xxxxx性开放| 亚洲AV日韩AV激情亚洲| 国产精品国产三级国产专i| 国产午夜精品一区理论片| 99久久亚洲综合精品成人网| 欧美FREESEX黑人又粗又大| 激情啪啪啪一区二区三区| 久久久久无码精品国产h动漫| 亚洲国产综合亚洲综合国产| 精品国产成人a在线观看 | 在线精品国产中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩另类精彩视频| 国产MD视频一区二区三区 | 制服丝袜美腿一区二区| 国产乱弄免费视频观看| 丰满少妇在线观看网站| 成人看的污污超级黄网站免费| 激情伊人五月天久久综合| 国产精品无码无片在线观看3d| 国产一区二区三区av在线无码观看 | 国产精品综合一区二区三区| 久久久久亚洲AV无码尤物| 国产成人精品区一区二区| 性欧美videofree高清精品| 国产精品日韩av在线播放| 四虎成人免费视频在线播放|