<blockquote id="pl83f"><p id="pl83f"></p></blockquote>
<s id="pl83f"><li id="pl83f"></li></s>

      
      
      <sub id="pl83f"><rt id="pl83f"></rt></sub>

        <blockquote id="pl83f"><p id="pl83f"></p></blockquote>
        <sub id="pl83f"><rt id="pl83f"></rt></sub>
        女人的天堂av在线播放,3d动漫精品一区二区三区,伦精品一区二区三区视频,国产成人av在线影院无毒,亚洲成av人片天堂网老年人,最新国产精品剧情在线ss,视频一区无码中出在线,无码国产精品久久一区免费

        News Analysis: Germany wants to fight climate change, but who will pay the bill?

        Source: Xinhua| 2019-07-18 20:33:58|Editor: xuxin
        Video PlayerClose

        by Stephanie Wolff

        BERLIN, July 18 (Xinhua) -- Germany is currently engaged in a political tug-of-war over the introduction of a price on carbon dioxide (CO2) to ramp up its climate protection efforts.

        In order to meet its national emissions targets, the German government intends to propose a major legislative package complete with support programs, new regulations and a CO2 price in September.

        While Germany's government aims to set a price on carbon emissions to promote climate-friendly technologies and behaviors, it has pledged not to penalize low-income citizens or to endanger the country's economy.

        At the beginning of July, German Environment Minister Svenja Schulze from the Social Democratic Party proposed a "socially acceptable" CO2 tax that would gradually make heating and fuels more expensive from 2020.

        According to Schulze's proposal, revenues from the CO2 tax would flow back to German citizens as a "climate premium" and the tax would not put an additional financial burden on low and middle income earners.

        Instead, "those who behave in a climate-friendly manner will be rewarded in future," Schulze emphasized.

        Last Friday, the German Council of Economic Experts (GCEE), which advises the German government, finally recommended that CO2 emissions from buildings and transport be made more expensive through a carbon price.

        "A CO2 price is the central instrument to get the problem of climate change under control," Ottmar Edenhofer, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, which contributed significantly to the expert report, told Xinhua.

        A carbon price "sets the right signals for the market" and would be the only way to ensure that "the costs of climate protection remain as low as possible," Edenhofer said.

        The GCEE made it clear, however, that including the transport and buildings sectors in the European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) would be the best way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the long term.

        German Chancellor Angela Merkel has welcomed the fact that the economic experts encouraged her government to "take market-based paths" and not to rely solely on regulatory measures. At the same time, Merkel emphasized that there would still be "broad discussions" on carbon pricing in Germany and there could be "no simple decisions."

        Germany is on course to miss its 2020 climate target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent compared to 1990 levels. According to the government's climate protection report for 2018, Germany will only achieve a 32 percent emissions reduction by next year.

        The environmental NGO Germanwatch sees a trend in Europe as well as internationally, which favors the introduction of CO2 prices in addition to emissions trading systems, such as the EU ETS.

        "CO2 pricing in transport and buildings in Germany should start in 2020 in order to significantly increase the speed at which emissions are reduced," Oldag Caspar, Germanwatch team leader for German and European low-carbon policy, told Xinhua.

        Although emissions from the German transport sector have stagnated since 1990 and fell slightly last year, the government's target of reducing transport emissions by up to 42 percent by 2030 would not be reached at the current pace, according to the Federal Environment Agency.

        While Minister Schulze had spoken out in favor of a flat carbon tax as early as April, Germany's political parties are at odds over how a CO2 price could be implemented.

        German Economic Affairs Minister Peter Altmaier from the Christian Democratic Union party has rejected the flat carbon tax "because it burdens many people without sustainably reducing CO2 emissions."

        The scientific advisory board of Altmaier's ministry has proposed significantly reducing and reforming taxes and levies on energy in Germany as well as abolishing the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) levy, which had been used to finance the country's energy transition.

        Instead, the German Economic Affairs Ministry seeks to use a CO2 price from emissions trading to incentivize domestic companies and citizens to invest in climate protection where it is "most cost-effective."

        Anton Hofreiter, leader of the Green Party's parliamentary group in the German Bundestag, has warned that "we do not have time for a long competition of ideas. In view of the dramatic nature of the climate crisis, action must now be taken quickly."

        The Green Party in Germany is calling for a carbon tax with a minimum price of 40 euros (44.86 U.S. dollars) per ton of CO2. In return, the German electricity tax should be largely abolished and each German citizen should receive 100 euros each year.

        In contrast, the German liberal Free Democrats (FDP) have consistently rejected a CO2 tax and called for the transport and buildings sectors to be integrated in the EU ETS. FDP climate politician Lukas Koehler said that "an arbitrarily fixed CO2 tax is a dangerous climate gamble."

        In an attempt to find a political middle ground, the leader of the German Christian Democrats, newly appointed Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, recently announced that she would invite the other political parties after the summer break to discuss "common solutions" in climate protection policy.

        "I am convinced that we need a national climate consensus" because it would not be sufficient to only agree within the government, Kramp-Karrenbauer told the public broadcaster ZDF.

        Support for a CO2 tax also came from the somewhat unlikely alliance of German business associations and trade unions in the form of the Federation of German Industries, the Federation of German Trade Unions and the Association of German Chambers of Commerce and Industry (DIHK).

        In a joint position paper, the alliance called for the introduction of carbon pricing through taxation as this would offer more planning security to allow German companies and consumers to adapt to the changing tax and to invest in environmentally-friendly alternatives.

        At the same time, the DIHK warned against placing additional burdens on German companies through new rules and stressed that climate protection is most effective if there is a global consensus.

        "The concept that is ultimately selected must therefore at least be compatible with European regulations in order to avoid competitive disadvantages for the German economy," DIHK President Eric Schweitzer told the newspaper Rheinische Post.

        Public support for a carbon tax in Germany has remained underwhelming, despite polls showing that a large majority of Germans believe that more climate action is needed. A recent survey conducted by the public broadcaster ARD found that only 39 percent of Germans supported a CO2 tax, compared to 57 percent, who did not think a CO2 tax made sense.

        However, the survey also showed that almost nine out of ten Germans saw a need, or even a "very significant" need, for more action to protect the climate, while just as many Germans thought that their country "should set a good example" in climate protection.

        The outcome of the ongoing debate over a carbon price in Germany will be closely watched by Germany's European partners. Something resembling a compromise is likely to emerge by September, when the German government aims to present its plans for more ambitious climate protection measures.

        "Politicians in Germany will probably opt for a tax solution or a hybrid system in the transport and buildings sectors," Germanwatch team leader Caspar told Xinhua. Nonetheless, a tax would still be "more predictable for people and can also come faster."

        Overall, the CO2 price debate reflects Germany's struggle to find an answer to the question of who will pay the bill for a more ambitious climate policy which, inevitably, will be an all-round expensive endeavor.

        TOP STORIES
        EDITOR’S CHOICE
        MOST VIEWED
        EXPLORE XINHUANET
        010020070750000000000000011100001382379071
        主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品999日本久久久影院| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久久| 中年国产丰满熟女乱子正在播放 | 亚洲二区中文字幕在线| 久久精品色妇熟女丰满| 亚洲男人的天堂久久香蕉| 无码人妻斩一区二区三区| 日本午夜精品一区二区| 成人免费A级毛片无码片2022| 中文字幕在线日韩| 少妇人妻偷人精品免费| 婷婷丁香五月六月综合激情啪| 91亚洲精品福利在线播放| 中文字幕99国产精品| 无码丰满熟妇| 久久国产精品色av免费看| 亚洲精品日韩在线观看| 亚洲欧美另类久久久精品播放的| 成人无码精品免费视频在线观看 | 综合在线 亚洲 成人 欧美| 国产欧美日韩另类精彩视频| 亚洲 制服 丝袜 无码| 日韩在线视频线观看一区| 无遮高潮国产免费观看韩国| 亚洲欧美日韩国产精品专区| 欧美大胆老熟妇乱子伦视频| 国产精品亚洲二区在线看| 熟妇的奶头又大又长奶水视频| 国产果冻豆传媒麻婆精东| 久久影院午夜伦手机不四虎卡| 国产精品乱码人妻一区二区三区| 一本一本久久A久久精品综合不卡| 国产免费丝袜调教视频免费的| 亚洲一区二区三区在线观看精品中文| 成全电影免费看| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽五月婷| 四川bbb搡bbb爽爽视频| 亚洲中文字幕一二三四区| 久久久一本精品99久久精品88| 色综合视频一区二区三区| 一个人免费观看WWW在线视频|